Thursday, July 18, 2024

Unforeseen contingency: the rise of freedom

American politics...  Unforeseen Contingencies is named for the event that is not only not expected in a probabilistic sense, but not even imagined.  In that sense, what we at Unforeseen Contingencies are observing does not really qualify as an unforeseen contingency for us, but for many it is.

First, there was the collapse of corrupt pedophile Joe Brandon during the debate, where his senility was revealed publicly for all to see.  Next, there was the attempted murder of Donald Trump by the Feds.  (I explain below.)  And now there's the Republican Convention, a political nominating convention unlike anything we have seen in a while: a event that overflows with principle and hope.

The debate: Biden is senile. It was obvious during the 2020 campaign that Joe Brandon was failing.  He has continually degenerated since then, and it is available for anyone to see.  Just see his 2016 convention address, or this  2014 clip of his unbelievable fitness (he nearly beats Barack Obama in a footrace around the White House!) (Um, er...  /s)  Biden's senility is now a matter of public record.  Bigwig Democrats are now admitting it.

Attempted murder of President Trump: Had it been successful, the attempt on the life of Mr. Trump would have plunged the Republican Convention into chaos and strengthened Joe Brandon's position.  But not only did the attempt fail, Mr. Trump rallied the crowd with a triumphant "Fight" and "USA!" chant.  Americans are hungry for a vision of courage, strength, and defiance against evil.  This was heroic moment of Trump's part, and iconic.    It resonates around the world.

The convention: There is much that could be said.  Suffice it to say that when the head of the Teamsters, and a black Democrat address a Republican convention because this is where normal Americans are welcome, there is a seed change occurring in American politics.  When renowned GOPe leader Mitch McConnell is booed at the Republican national convention, there is a seed change occurring in American politics.  (Don't miss the short speech by black Democrat Madeline Brame.  It will be six minutes well spent.)  The convention seems to be a celebration of hope and renewal of important values (entirely unlike the phony "hope and change" marxism of Barack Obama).

UC's bottom line is that we are potentially on the verge of a reversal of the destruction of Western civilization and the imposition of the twin scourges of statism and cultural marxism.  Certainly the battle is being fought.  And people appear to be rallying to the example set by Trump.  For many, this is an unforeseen contingency.  But whether it is anticipated or not, it is a very hopeful thing.

**  **  **  

Now, what's this about the Feds trying to assassinate Trump?  Well, if the things reported in the MSM are true:

1. The Secret Service (SS) decided not to control the most obvious position overlooking the venue.  Cheatle's excuse that the roof had a slope and thus was too dangerous to post anyone is idiotic and obviously false.  The murderer's body did not roll off the roof once he was eliminated.  The snipers who ultimately killed the assassin were posted on a much steeper roof.  And roofers regularly put shingles on roofs that are far  steeper, without plummeting to the ground.

2. The police who were stationed in the building observed and photographed the sniper 30 minutes before the  shooting.  He was using a range finder, a device that measures the distance to a target.  They noticed he had a backpack.  Yet he was not stopped and searched.  

3. Numerous people in the crowd noticed the assassin crawling on the roof and saw that he had a gun.  They videoed him and shouted and pointed him out to the SS.  This was more than a minute before the shooting.

4. A law enforcement officer (LEO) climbed the ladder the murderer had set, to see what he was doing.  The murderer pointed his rifle at the LEO, who retreated.

5. All of this was observed by LEO snipers on another, steeper rooftop, through their riflescopes and spotting scopes.  With these scopes you can read the brand name on someone's jeans at 400 yards.  So the LEO snipers knew that they had a man armed with a rifle trying to sneak up on the President.  They allegedly asked for permission to shoot, which was denied.  Unh... I lived in Pennsylvania for a year, and before I went I studied PA's self defense law.  I could have legally shot the murderer when he was crawling  with a weapon.  When he pointed it at the LEO, the case for shooting him was airtight.  And then he pointed it at the President.  Yet they didn't shoot him.

6. The murderer fired eight rounds at Trump, murdering Corey Comperatore and wounding three others, including the President.  The shots took 4-5 seconds.  The LEO snipers (SS?) waited that long to respond and kill the assassin, even though they had rifles mounted on tripods aimed at him.  The only reasonable conclusion is that they allowed him to touch off eight rounds.  This morning I ran an experiment with a shot timer.  In less than four seconds I can pick up a firearm and put two rounds into the A zone of two targets.  And I'm not a trained professional, just a an amateur enthusiast.  

7. Trump's security detail included women who are clearly out-of-shape and untrained.  His regular bodyguards had been diverted to cover a speech by Jill Biden.  He was given incompetent idiots who didn't know what to do; the fat one couldn't even figure out how to holster her pistol.

8. Local police were locked out of the venue and had to ram a gate with a police cruiser to get in, once trouble developed.  The SS is blaming local authorities for security lapses, an obviously ridiculous position.

This is not an exhaustive list (yes, there's more), but the only reasonable conclusion I can draw is that the Feds allowed the murderer to shoot at Trump.  They had many opportunities to stop him prior to him opening fire, and no legal restrictions that might have stopped them.  They observed him preparing to shoot, what with his range finding and his crawling around with a rifle and pointing at the LEO.  Once he started firing they allowed him to get off eight rounds, and only then did they kill him.  One would have to be stupid, addled by ideology, to think this is just a bunch of mistakes.  The same people who lied to FISA courts, bugged Trump Tower, promoted the Russian disinformation dossier, lied and claimed Hunter's laptop was simply Russian disinformation, have now tried to kill Donald Trump.  That's the obvious conclusion from the points above.

**  **  **

And these are in rough times, and they will get rougher.  God willing, reason and freedom will triumph.  And there's hope.  Unforeseen contingencies will prevail!


Comments:
Unfortunately, Trump and much of the Republican party seem obsessed with giving Ukraine (and, by extension, all Europe) to Russia. Attacking Zelensky and demanding that all US aid to Ukraine be stopped has become a pillar of Trump's presidential campaign. His foreign policy, if he is elected, will be to pick on freedom-loving Europeans for resisting Putin. His misogynist candidate VP presents a "plan" that Ukraine must capitulate to the aggressor, and when Zelensky says this isn't going to happen, senior Republicans chastise him for messing into US politics. It seems that large numbers of US voters want Ukraine abandoned (thinking, wrongly, that stopping US aid to Ukraine would greatly improve their economical situation), and GOP is now courting them. The Democrats aren't much better. It seems that the America I loved, the beacon of freedom, is no more.
 
Thanks for your comment, Maya. But I think you are mistaken. I don't think Trump will give up Ukraine. Unlike Obama (who is probably feeding instructions to the Biden administration, not sure who feeds him his instructions), Trump armed Ukraine during his term in office and systematically opposed Putin.

Vance isn't a misogynist; I'm not sure why you think this, but the American media are utterly unreliable.

I do agree that the anti-Ukraine "conservatives are abandoning freedom. I know some here, and they babble about "Russia's interests," assuming that Putin's interests are the interests of the Russian people, or that Russians' interests are more important that interests of citizens of neighboring countries.

I am pleased you are reading my blog. It's great hearing from you.
 
Thank you!
The Republican-dominated Congress, presumably at Trump's bidding, halted military aid to Ukraine for more than half a year. This cost Ukraine thousands of lives and important territories, and started the slow but steady Russian advance that continues to this day. And even after Mike Johnson introduced the aid package to be voted, most Republicans voted against it.
To me, this harm done by Trump to Ukraine, and his endless picking on Zelensky and praising Putin, eclipses his arms supplies to Ukraine in the more distant past and indicates what his policy will be if he is elected. I hope to be wrong but Ukrainians have no reason to expect anything good from Trump.
About Vance, I meant his infamous comment about "childless cat ladies", to whom he attached also a gay man, Pete Buttigieg. And also his stance against abortion.
Vance has repeatedly spoken against Ukraine. He presented a "peace plan" so pro-Russian that seemed to have been drafted by Putin. And only a day ago, he said on the News Nation TV that exhausted Ukraine must give up territories to end the war. Apparently, he is convinced that another land grab by Putin is exactly what Trump's voters and potential voters want most.
The situation is bleak.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?