Sunday, January 06, 2019
Happy Christmas, Orthodox
But let's keep this on a more Christmas-y note. There are various ways of looking at Christmas -- "hope," "good cheer," "kindness" ... all of these are supposed to be Christmas sentiments. But it really seems more appropriate to think of Christmas as a celebration of having been rescued, or of doom averted and happiness assured. The story of Christmas is of God coming to save humans from doom; it's a very positive story, and whether one believes it or not, this should be a time of being grateful that we're here. We belong in the universe. And I think it a great time to re-dedicate ourselves to building a happier, freer world.
Merry Christmas! Христос Рождається!
National Radio Television of Afghanistan!
Friday, January 04, 2019
Chang'e 4 on the Moon!
It's off to an interesting start, with one foul-mouthed radical in Congress spewing hate, and another vowing confiscatory taxes and destruction of our energy systems. If left to their own designs, these people will bring us to ruin, so in response, junior senator Mitt Romney decided to "bring us together" (and co-incidentally launch his 2020 presidential bid, heh) by preaching against Donald Trump's alleged failure to be sufficiently nice. And Pocahontas declared she's running for president. Such shenanigans.
But meanwhile, elsewhere, some other human beings actually are up to some serious stuff, very serious stuff. China has landed the Chang'e 4 explorer on the far side of the moon, and is exploring. SpaceNews and Space.com have coverage. This is really interesting and important. Narcissi Craig of Victory Girls laments that "We Just Lost the Moon."
I would say we’re not lost yet. But we should pay attention. I'll expand on the comment I left on her post.
One of the very biggest developments the future decades will be the building of the economy in space. Morgan Stanley predicts the space economy will be over 1 trillion USD in 20 years (about three or four times what it is now); I think that will be low, but regardless, it will continue. Humans are on the verge of developing a Kardeshevian Type I civilization. As we do, the space economy will grow and very likely surpass the Earth economy. It's really only the time frame that should be in dispute here.
Building this economy will require development of private property rights in outer space. This will happen, because the benefits relative to costs of doing so are going up over time. Currently, property rights are supposedly prohibited by the international Outer Space Treaty of 1967, to which most nations (including the U.S. and PRC) are signatories, but this will prove toothless. The race is already on, now, to establish property claims. Think Huntington's Clash of Civilizations in space. Whoever owns space will essentially run human civilization for the next few centuries at least. Also, whoever dominates space militarily will dominate Earth militarily. It would be desirable, for those of us who believe in individual liberty, if it were the Western liberal civilization. Humans will do much better with this than any alternative.
Fools in the Western nations who imagine the great global challenge is “sustainability” and that the great goal is to decarbonize and to detechnologize would hand the game to the Chinese. (And I can imagine the Chinese and Russians might not mind encouraging us in this.) The insane push for socialism in America has to be defeated, and it must be done and quickly and thoroughly. Chang'e 4 is rolling.
Monday, December 31, 2018
Happy New Year from Unforeseen Contingencies!
I'm having a bit of trouble posting because of hardware problems (what the heck happened to my mouse?!) so will keep this short.
The Unforeseen Contingencies Forecasting Department has a new batch of predictions ready to go, but I'll post them later. Briefly, though, P1. Next year at this time, Donald Trump will still be president, despite the best efforts of the Democrats to depose him. P2. The U.S. economy will continue economic growth at 3% or higher. P3. Proposals by the international "climate community" will meet increasingly stiff opposition at the national level around the world. They'll not be implemented. P5. U.S. carbon emissions will far and E.U. carbon emissions will rise. P6. The world space economy will grow faster than world per capita GDP growth, and both will be positive. P7. The Iranian regime will be racked by inner turmoil that that approaches civil war, but will not collapse. Its military adventures in Iraq, Syria, Yemen, and elsewhere will fail, though, as the Iranian Guard spends its efforts suppressing the Iranian people. P8. At least one Democrat in the U.S. Congress expresses sympathy for Marxism. And, of course, the Wild Card... extra terrestrial life will be discovered.
More soon! Meanwhile, Happy New Year to all!
Friday, December 28, 2018
The IPCC's green socialism
Re the IPCC report, one of my students commented directly to me "I'm stunned by how explicitly it recommends 'transfer of wealth' to underveloped societies. How is this supposed to be accomplished? Amazing how a 'scientific study' assumes authority to assign responsibility (never to the backwards countries, of course)."
Excellent point. If we want to understand why some countries are poor, we only have to examine the government of any or all of them - backwards indeed describes them, as well as corrupt. Taxing citizens of rich countries and giving to these governments is a terrible idea. The people at the Katowice climate conference who voted to accept this are either would-be recipients, or would-be tax collectors; they are not the taxpayers they hope to enslave. Aid to governments entrenches the power-hungry and the corrupt, and undercuts development.
That the IPCC proposes this shows it is not a serious scientific organization. There's no attempt, not even a half-arsed one, to analyze the effects of these proposed policies. And there's no scientific economics behind it. It's a socialist political platform masquerading as environmental sustainability.
Photo: a thing of beauty that makes humans better off.
More on Kashoggi, the fake "journalist"
Perhaps most problematic for Khashoggi were his connections to an organization funded by Saudi Arabia’s regional nemesis, Qatar. Text messages between Khashoggi and an executive at Qatar Foundation International show that the executive, Maggie Mitchell Salem, at times shaped the columns he submitted to The Washington Post, proposing topics, drafting material and prodding him to take a harder line against the Saudi government. Khashoggi also appears to have relied on a researcher and translator affiliated with the organization.
Saudi Arabia and especially the more liberal anti-Islamist factions including MBS, have been in a struggle against the Qataris. So have been the Emirates and other Arab governments. The Qataris, on the other hand, have been major supporters of Islamism and terrorist groups, including Hamas. Kashoggi was working for the Qataris in their struggle against the Saudis. Yes, he's a fine "guardian" for lefty progressives everywhere to adulate.
Powerline has the complete story. The article contains links to further pieces of evidence that Kashoggi was not journalist but an intelligence agent and propagandist.
Monday, December 24, 2018
Merry Christmas! Gregorian calendar...
Saturday, December 15, 2018
More on Oumuamua
Observers have drawn two conclusions from this episode which are worth noting:
1. We ought to have a probe ready for the next time this happens. Apparently it is within our technological capability to investigate an object that comes as close as Oumuamua, but we'd have to be prepared. There was very little time from the moment Oumuamua was first detected.
2. That "very little time" ought to concern us, because a large object could be hurtling towards us on a collision course right now. Oumuamua shows that such an object can get very close without us noticing -- too close for us to have time to react. If we want to avoid Lucifer's Hammer and expect to do anything about it, we ought to begin preparing now.
Regardless, no one can figure out what the heck this thing is. It's highly unlikely humans will ever know.
Friday, December 14, 2018
A quick word in support of Mohammed bin Salman
I first caught wind of this when a friend, a Muslim who often travels to Saudi Arabia, told me how astonished he was at the changes he'd observed since MBS had taken the position. My friend called it radical westernization and modernization. He detailed some of the efforts -- things that have gone unreported in the Western MSM -- and correctly predicted that women would be able to drive soon. MBS has also cracked down on corruption, on the Muslim Brotherhood, on radical Wahhabism, and Shia/Iranian expansionism. It's crucial that this project succeed, for Saudi Arabia is the center for Islam. If Islam is to become compatible with liberal civilization, Saudi Arabia must reform, and that's the project of MBS.
In the West, allies of the Muslim Brotherhood and the Iranian regime -- particularly those allies in the mainstream media -- are up in (figurative) arms, so much so that they've taken sides with the Islamist dictator of Turkey, Recep Erdogan, over the death of Jamal Khashoggi and even taken to calling the deceased op-ed writer a "journalist." (I've written op-eds, so now I'm a "journalist?" Wow!) The MSM has also condemned Saudi Arabia's perfectly legitimate intervention against the Houthis in Yemen. This is a war by Yemen and Saudi Arabia against one of Iran's proxies and by extension against the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps. Yes, nothing like the MSM defending colonialist wars by Iranian Islamists who declare their intent to destroy the United States and Israel, and condemning their opponents.
Mohammed bin Salman is the first Arab leader to say Israelis have a right to have their own land. Mohammed bin Salman is the Arab leader most insistent that the Palestinians must start negotiating and give up their dream of expelling the Jews. Mohammed bin Salman is modernizing and westernizing Saudi Arabia, he's building an alliance with Israel, he's opposing Iranian expansionism... he is, in the Saudi Arabian context, a liberal. In a grand show of virtue posturing, the U.S. Senate stupidly voted to condemn him. But he and his reform efforts deserve our support. I hope President Trump will ignore the Senate's posturing and continue to build U.S.-Saudi relations.
Photo: Mohammed bin Salman and another great Middle Eastern leader.